Only people. And dogs. And cats if they so choose. And horses, of course. And guinea pigs and sugar gliders and all those other warm, fuzzy creatures people keep as pets, probably, and maybe even snakes. But not spiders.
And definitely not the Internet.
Social media has taken passive aggression to heights the military psychiatrists who first coined the term in 1945 could never have imagined. See if this sounds familiar. Somebody is pissing you off. That meaner has hurt your feelings, stolen your happy thought, danced all over your last damned nerve. But for whatever reason, you don’t want to confront them directly. Maybe they have more power than you. Maybe a confrontation will just turn into this whole big thing, and who needs that? Maybe it’s just in your nature to be a passive-aggressive whiny-ass. Don’t be ashamed; millions share your affliction and parade it daily. In any case, telling the source of your pain to piss off directly is not an option. But even so, you cannot in good conscience allow that blight on humanity to get away with that shit even one more time.
So you take it to the Internet. Without ever actually defining the conflict or identifying your oppressor, you air your grievance. You open a vein and spill. The individual people who read your post and know you will probably hate it. People (and dogs, etc.) who genuinely care when you’re hurting would much rather know exactly who did you wrong and how so they know where to show up and whether to bring you a nice, consoling milkshake or quick lime and a gun. Those individual people will probably send you some kind of a private message asking some version of “WTF is going on?” If they really love you, they’ll restrain themselves from adding, “You passive-aggressive whiny-ass?”
But the Internet looooooves (or”Liiiiiiiiikes”) your post. Not you; never you; but your passive-aggressive reveal of yourself as the victim of some wrong. Because that allows the Internet to feel one of its favorite things. Pity. Friends of friends you’ve never even heard of will come out of the woodwork to tell you how sorry they are, how rotten those unnamed bastards can be (they know; their lives are full up to the top with unnamed bastards), how deeply they feel your pain. Each one of those individual posts comes from an individual person who is probably quite nice and almost certainly means well. But taken collectively in response to shit they in fact know nothing about, they aren’t people; they’re the swarm that is the Internet.
Which doesn’t mean it can’t make you feel better. That spontaneous outpouring of impersonal pity can feel like just the balm you need to get you past your pain. But be careful. Because it isn’t love or even empathy. It’s just pity.
Pity gives the Internet a seemingly benign outlet for its most favorite thing of all: feeling superior. “Oh, you poor baby!” spoken by a loved one means, “I feel bad because you feel bad.” “Oh you poor baby,” from the Internet means, “Maybe my life is shit and I’m a moron, but at least I’m better off than this poor bastard.” Passive aggressive pronouncements of pain make this kind of judging effortless. If you never say what the problem is, the Internet can assume the absolute, wickedest worst. So be careful.
This is why the Internet, for all its, “You go, girl/boy/undetermined gender and that’s your choice and yay for you!” grandstanding, loves the weak and hates the strong. The weak make the Internet feel better about itself. The strong . . . those bitches are just showing off. And it can turn on you faster than you can hit “Send.” The same endless wellsprings of kindness who succored you through your misery will stone you in the public square just as soon as you tell them you’re better. Because the Internet doesn’t love you. It loves pitying you. And it loves judging you even more. So be careful. Hipster. Hypocrite. Poseur. Slut. These are all Internet synonyms for “possibly superior to me in some way.” And they’re far from the worst.
The Internet is a mob, a hive brain, specialized bits and pieces but rarely the whole of all those individuals with an IP address, banded together for the sole purpose of belonging at any cost. Every chat group, every friends list, every hashtag is a different mob with a different focus, but it all amounts to the same thing–be one of us, be no better than the median, or be the Other. The Enemy. That’s how teen-age girls get hounded into suicide. That’s how female game designers get hounded out of their homes.
And of course I know it’s not all bad. That same hive brain, that same Internet can accomplish great things, raise huge wads of cash for charity, spread awareness of social ills, keep Firefly on the air–wait, not that, but stuff like that. But it doesn’t do it for love. It does it to belong. It does it to feel superior. It does it to judge. The motives of individual people can be entirely altruistic–they genuinely want to help. But the Internet just wants to be so right that all who oppose it are wrong. Meaning it can eat them.
There are wonderful, amazing, kind, brilliant people all over the Internet. I met my husband there. He’s a person; I know him as a person; I trust him as a person. I know the bits and pieces of his character he shows to the digital world, and I know all the other stuff, too. And I know he loves me, he himself. the individual human. Not the Internet.
The Internet can’t love you. Get a dog.
Aloha Lucy,
Your post about the character of the Internet and Social Media has opened a floodgate in my mind – Thank you! (I am having trouble writing this because “usage ideas” keep popping into my thoughts.)
I have scratched a bald spot on the back of my head trying to figure out why some things are so popular and others not. My ideas were rapidly sinking toward, “The IQ of a group falls with each new member.”
But now, in only a thousand or so words, you have given me a new “control dial” – pity. I can hardly wait to start turning the dial and seeing what happens.
I love new ideas (well, new to me anyway) – Thank you
.
A Hui Hou,
Wayne
PS — I miss Firefly.
Wayne, I’m not sure your original theory doesn’t have a lot of merit too. 😉 Seriously, let me know what you come up with; I’d love to read it.